How to Reduce Water Consumption in a Mineral Processing Plant
563Learn how to reduce mineral processing water use with water balance, thickening, filtration, recycling, and process control.
View detailsSearch the whole station Crushing Equipment
A mobile crusher plant price in South America may range from approximately USD 80,000 to more than USD 900,000. The final amount depends on whether the quotation covers one crusher or a complete crushing and screening line.

Capacity alone cannot define the price. A 150 TPH mobile jaw crusher used for primary reduction costs much less than a 150 TPH closed-circuit plant containing a jaw crusher, cone crusher, screen, return conveyor, generator, and spare parts.
Buyers should therefore compare the process, equipment scope, power system, transport requirements, and responsibilities included in each proposal. This guide explains the main cost boundaries and how to prepare a realistic mobile crushing project budget.
The following figures are preliminary equipment-budget references. They are not fixed selling prices or delivered project costs.
| Reference Capacity | Typical Mobile Configuration | Preliminary Equipment Budget |
|---|---|---|
| 50–80 TPH | Compact mobile jaw, optional screen | USD 80,000–180,000 |
| 80–150 TPH | Mobile jaw plus secondary crusher and screen | USD 180,000–450,000 |
| 150–300 TPH | Heavy-duty jaw, cone or impact stage, screen and return circuit | USD 350,000–900,000+ |
A plant near the lower end of a range may have a wheeled chassis, basic controls, grid-electric drive, and fewer conveyors. A plant near the upper end may include tracked units, diesel-electric power, pre-screening, closed-circuit screening, remote controls, dust suppression, magnets, and an extended wear-parts package.
The prices above normally refer to equipment supplied from the manufacturer. They may exclude:
The equipment budget should not be confused with the total investment required before commercial production begins. Buyers comparing mobile and stationary systems across a wider capacity range can use the separate 50–500 TPH stone crusher plant price guide.
Two quotations can both state “150 TPH mobile crusher plant” while covering very different equipment.

A single mobile crushing unit commonly includes:
A complete production line may also include:
| Quotation Item | Basic Crusher Unit | Complete Mobile Line |
|---|---|---|
| Feeder and primary crusher | Included | Included |
| Secondary crushing | Usually excluded | Included when required |
| Product screening | Usually excluded | Included |
| Oversize recirculation | Excluded | Included in a closed circuit |
| Generator | Optional | Optional or integrated |
| Finished-product conveyors | Limited | Included according to product sizes |
| Installation support | Depends on supplier | Should be clearly defined |
| Spare-parts package | Basic or optional | Project-specific package recommended |
The proposal should identify the exact model, installed power, machine weight, shipping dimensions, crusher setting, expected capacity conditions, and every optional component.
It should also state what the buyer must arrange locally. Unclear supply boundaries are one of the main reasons a low initial quotation later becomes an expensive project.
The crusher type affects the initial price, power requirement, wear-parts cost, and equipment needed around it. The lowest-priced crusher is not automatically the least expensive option per ton.

Mobile jaw crusher
A mobile jaw crusher is normally the primary unit. It accepts large rock and reduces it before screening, transport, or secondary crushing.
A jaw-only configuration costs less than a complete aggregate line. However, it cannot usually produce several tightly controlled, cubical aggregate sizes by itself.
The mobile jaw crusher selection guide explains feed opening, real capacity, standalone operation, and complete-line configurations.
Mobile cone crusher
A mobile cone crusher is commonly selected after the jaw crusher for granite, basalt, river stone, copper ore, and other hard or abrasive materials.
Cone equipment often has a higher initial cost than a basic impact unit. The line may also need controlled feeding, closed-circuit screening, and a return conveyor. However, compression crushing normally provides more predictable wear costs on abrasive rock.
For hard-rock projects, the mobile cone crusher price guide for Chile covers chamber selection, closed-side setting, circulating load, liner consumption, and high-altitude operation.
Mobile impact crusher
A mobile impact crusher suits limestone, sandstone, clean concrete, road material, and other low- to medium-abrasive feed.
It can provide a high reduction ratio and good particle shape. Recycling configurations may also require a pre-screen, magnet, and material-sorting system.
The mobile impact crusher project guide explains when impact crushing is more suitable than cone crushing.
| Mobile Crusher Type | Main Duty | Typical Material | Initial Price Direction | Main Cost Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaw crusher | Primary crushing | Most rock and clean concrete | Medium | Oversized feed and jaw-plate wear |
| Cone crusher | Secondary or tertiary crushing | Hard and abrasive rock | Higher | Liners, power, and circulating load |
| Impact crusher | Secondary crushing and shaping | Limestone and recycling | Medium | Blow-bar wear on abrasive feed |
Crusher selection must begin with material properties and required products. Choosing an impact crusher only because its initial price is lower may create excessive wear on basalt. Likewise, using a cone crusher for soft limestone may add cost without creating enough operating benefit.
Plant capacity affects much more than the main crusher size. Higher output may require a larger feeder, wider conveyors, more screen area, stronger chassis, higher installed power, and greater stockpile capacity.
However, the required finished products often influence price more than the feed rate.
Consider two plants that both receive 100 TPH:
Plant B normally needs secondary crushing, a multi-deck screen, additional conveyors, controlled recirculation, and separate product stockpiles. Its equipment cost will be higher even though the hourly feed rate is the same.

| Production Requirement | Likely Process | Relative Investment |
|---|---|---|
| Primary-crushed material only | Mobile jaw crusher | Lowest |
| One broad road-base product | Mobile jaw plus screen | Low to medium |
| Cubical limestone aggregate | Mobile jaw, impact crusher, and screen | Medium |
| Hard-rock commercial aggregate | Mobile jaw, cone crusher, and screen | Medium to high |
| Several products with controlled oversize | Two-stage crushing, multi-deck screen, and return circuit | High |
| Aggregate plus manufactured-sand feed | Additional fine crushing or shaping | Highest |
A 50–100 TPH project can sometimes begin with one primary crusher and add screening or secondary crushing later. The 50–100 TPH small quarry guide explains when phased expansion is practical.
At 100–200 TPH, the crusher, screen, conveyors, power, and circulating load must be balanced as one system. The 100–200 TPH aggregate plant cost guide compares representative limestone, granite, and aggregate-plus-sand configurations.
Advertised crusher capacity should not be treated as guaranteed saleable output. Moisture, clay, feed grading, crusher settings, screen efficiency, return load, wear, and operating utilization all affect continuous production.
Tracked and wheeled plants use similar crushing principles, but their chassis, relocation methods, and site requirements differ.
Tracked equipment generally has a higher initial price because it contains crawler drives, hydraulic travel systems, and a heavier integrated structure. Its value comes from repositioning within mines, quarries, demolition sites, and road projects.
Wheeled equipment normally costs less and can be practical on prepared sites. It may need support legs, leveling work, towing equipment, and suitable road access.

| Cost and Operation Item | Tracked Mobile Plant | Wheeled Mobile Plant |
|---|---|---|
| Initial equipment cost | Usually higher | Usually lower |
| Movement inside rough sites | Better | More limited |
| Long-distance transport | Low-bed trailer normally required | Easier when road rules permit |
| Site preparation | Lower in many applications | Prepared and level area preferred |
| Hydraulic travel maintenance | Required | Less complex |
| Best value condition | Frequent on-site repositioning | Planned relocation between prepared sites |
Tracked does not mean the plant can travel long distances on public roads by itself. Machine weight, width, height, axle restrictions, local permits, and low-bed availability still need to be confirmed.
If the crusher will remain in the same position for most of the project, paying more for crawler mobility may not create a financial return. If the quarry face moves regularly, a cheaper wheeled unit may create higher relocation and civil-work costs.
The detailed tracked vs wheeled mobile crusher comparison covers transport frequency, terrain, setup, and lifetime operating cost.
The factory price is only the starting point. A realistic budget should follow the equipment from the manufacturer to stable production at the final site.
A useful calculation is:
Installed project cost = equipment price + export packing + freight and insurance + import costs + inland transport + site work + installation + commissioning + initial operating support

The final amount changes with:
Before shipment, the supplier should provide equipment weights, transport dimensions, lifting points, packing lists, and unloading instructions. The buyer or local logistics company should verify the route from the port to the working site.
Installation costs also depend on the configuration. A single tracked jaw crusher may require limited setup. A multi-unit wheeled line can require leveling, supports, conveyor connections, electrical cabling, dust-control piping, stockpile planning, and trial production.
Remote mining projects may need additional investment in generators, fuel storage, transformers, communication, lighting, workshops, and larger spare-parts inventories. High-altitude projects may also require engine or generator derating.
No fixed percentage should be added to every project. Current freight, import, inland transport, and local-service quotations should be collected separately before the purchase decision.
A useful quotation requires more than a capacity number. “Mobile crusher, 150 TPH” does not define the material, final products, equipment stages, or delivery scope.
| Required Information | Why It Affects the Price |
|---|---|
| Country, destination port, and site location | Defines shipping and inland transport |
| Material name and photographs | Supports the initial crusher choice |
| Hardness and abrasion test data | Affects crusher type and wear parts |
| Maximum and normal feed size | Defines feeder and primary crusher size |
| Required saleable output | Determines actual plant capacity |
| Final product sizes and percentage split | Defines secondary crushing and screening |
| Moisture, clay, soil, and natural fines | Shows whether pre-screening is required |
| Operating hours per day | Supports power and wear-parts planning |
| Site altitude and temperature | Affects engines, cooling, and lubrication |
| Available voltage and frequency | Defines motors, generators, and controls |
| Terrain and relocation frequency | Guides tracked or wheeled selection |
| Existing equipment | Prevents unnecessary duplication |
| Required delivery and service scope | Defines quotation boundaries |
Buyers should also request the following information from each supplier:
Cost can often be controlled without reducing useful production. Practical options include beginning with a primary mobile jaw and reserving connections for later expansion, using grid power where reliable, avoiding unnecessary crawler mobility, and selecting screen capacity according to actual product demand.
However, removing a required secondary crusher, selecting an undersized screen, or reducing critical wear parts only transfers the cost to low output and future downtime.
The best quotation is not necessarily the lowest total on the first page. It is the proposal with a clear process, balanced capacity, complete supply boundary, realistic logistics plan, and predictable operating requirements.
How much does a complete mobile crusher plant cost in South America?
A preliminary equipment budget may range from approximately USD 80,000 for a compact primary unit to more than USD 900,000 for a heavy multi-stage tracked line. The final price depends on capacity, crusher type, screening, power, mobility, and included equipment.
Is a mobile crusher cheaper than a stationary crusher plant?
Not always. Mobile equipment may have a higher machine cost because of the chassis and integrated systems. It can reduce foundation work, installation time, and relocation costs. Stationary plants may provide better value for long-term production at one permanent site.
Can one mobile crusher produce several finished aggregate sizes?
A crusher alone cannot separate several calibrated products. A mobile screen and separate conveyors are required. Secondary crushing may also be necessary to improve particle shape and control the top size.
Why are two quotations for the same TPH so different?
One quotation may cover only a primary crusher, while another includes secondary crushing, screening, return conveyors, power, controls, dust suppression, spare parts, and technical support. Compare the equipment list and supply boundary, not only the stated capacity.
What costs are usually excluded from the equipment price?
Ocean freight, insurance, import duties, port charges, inland transport, cranes, site preparation, local electrical work, installation, commissioning, fuel, and long-term spare parts may be excluded unless they are specifically listed.
A reliable mobile crusher plant budget begins with a clear process and an itemized supply scope. Capacity, material, final products, mobility, power, shipping, and local installation should all be confirmed before comparing final quotations.
Learn how to reduce mineral processing water use with water balance, thickening, filtration, recycling, and process control.
View detailsSelecting between a and a Rod Mill is a critical decision in mineral processing. This choice impacts recovery rates, power use, and overall plant profit. A ball mill uses steel balls to grind ore into fine powder. A rod mill uses long st...
View detailsAs an expert with decades in the mineral processing industry, I have seen "best-sellers" change many times. In the past, it was all about raw power. In the 2000s, it was about high throughput. But in 2026, the "best-selling" machines are different...
View detailsStone crusher costs can vary dramatically even when two plants have the same production capacity. In real quarry operations, the final investment depends on rock hardness, equipment quality, automation level, mobility, and long-term operating cost...
View details